Language selection

Search

Annual Report 2022-2023

Table of Contents

Message from the Chief Administrator and Chief Executive Officer

‟From coast to coast to coast, we work together to ensure that Canadians have access to, and trust in, a fair, efficient, and effective justice system.”
Darlene H. Carreau

Darlene H. Carreau LL.B.
Chief Administrator and
Chief Executive Officer

It is my pleasure to present the 2022–23 Annual Report for the Courts Administration Service (CAS). CAS is a small department within the portfolio of the Minister of Justice that provides registry, judicial and corporate services to our 4 federally-constituted courts: the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA), the Federal Court (FC), the Court Martial Appeal Court (CMAC) and the Tax Court of Canada (TCC), known collectively as the Courts. It is playing a pivotal role in supporting the cost-effective delivery of justice to all Canadians, bolstering public trust in Canadian institutions and the rule of law, while also safeguarding judicial independence.

2023 marks CAS’s 20th anniversary. The past 2 decades have ushered in significant changes, both in the expectations of those turning to the Courts and in the range of technological advancements that are available to streamline court operations and improve service delivery.

This report highlights CAS’s achievements over the past fiscal year. I am proud to report that we continued to build on the innovative responses that we deployed in the pandemic to sustain and reimagine court administration. In 2022–23, CAS received an historic-level investment of $248M over 5 years to modernize and expand our court facilities across Canada. These important investments will ensure Canadians will have access to modern, equipped, digitally-enabled, accessible and secure court facilities across Canada for many years to come. Furthermore, we continued to prioritize the attraction, development, and retention of a high-performing and diverse workforce, and we implemented measures to further instill a service culture and a client-centric mindset.

In some cases, these achievements are associated with significant challenges from previous years that CAS continues to navigate. CAS was forced to revisit its approach to digital modernization, take stock of important lessons learned and address identified risks. Generally, we needed to establish a better, more resilient foundation to ensure future success. While such efforts are rarely glamorous, I believe that the work we have invested in this past year will pay dividends in the coming years.

CAS is a small organization with an ambitious agenda, operating in a complex environment with limited funding. In an age of constant change—where collectively Canadians and their institutions are navigating new technologies, evolving geopolitics and a challenging economy—CAS will continue to exercise sound financial stewardship while being innovative, agile, and resilient. Several measures are underway and will continue into 2023–24 to address specific funding pressures and work towards a more sustainable funding base. We are cognizant that without concerted efforts to both realize efficiencies and make the case for increased funding, there is a risk that current funding levels could impact our ability to meet the changing needs of the judiciary and Canadians, and ultimately undercut judicial independence and the rule of law. We are urgently seized with this work as a result.

We are commemorating our 20th anniversary by celebrating our achievements in support of our mandate, while also reflecting on the opportunities that lie ahead. More than 10% of our employees have worked at CAS since its creation; this is a testament to their dedication. I am incredibly proud of our workforce, particularly how every employee contributes to our success. From coast to coast to coast, we work together to ensure that Canadians have access to, and trust in, a fair, efficient, and effective justice system.

CAS has benefited immeasurably from the ongoing collaboration and support of the judiciary we serve. I extend my sincere gratitude to them, to my executive team, and to the dedicated employees of CAS who are key to our efforts to preserve and enhance access to justice, rule of law, independence of the courts and the public’s trust—fundamental principles of democracy that breathe life into Canada’s judicial branch of government.

Darlene H. Carreau, LL.B.
Chief Administrator and Chief Executive Officer

Our priorities

Digital courts

Deliver information technology solutions that provide for the effective management of court business, offer self-service to litigants and improve access to justice.

Workforce of the future

Attract, retain and develop a highly skilled, diverse and engaged workforce. Optimize our work environment and strengthen management excellence.

National courthouses and court facilities

Deliver modern, equipped, accessible and secure federal court facilities across Canada.

Service excellence

Provide consistent, quality and timely client-centric services. Modernize our practices, processes and tools, and integrate new business and technological solutions.

Part I: 2022–23 highlights

CAS provides registry, judicial and corporate services to the Courts. This Annual Report highlights CAS’s achievements and initiatives in the 2022–23 fiscal year.

We can look back on 2022–23 as a pivot year, where we exited the pandemic and started to prioritize longer-term strategic planning, identifying and addressing weaknesses in our foundations, and building on lessons learned. It was the first in what will be a series of transitional years, as CAS tackles an ambitious agenda of modernization and resiliency. In so doing, we continued to be guided by our 4 strategic priorities identified in the 2021–22 Annual Report: Digital courts, Workforce of the future, National courthouses and court facilities and Service excellence.

Digital courtsDeliver information technology solutions that provide for the effective management of court business, offer self-service to litigants and improve access to justice.

In 2019, CAS launched a multi-year project to implement a new Courts and Registry Management System (CRMS) that would replace its legacy systems and enable the electronic management of court business. Almost immediately thereafter, CAS was confronted by the COVID-19 pandemic and was forced to fast track the implementation of a range of measures and technologies to deliver justice remotely and ensure continuity of court operations. While the solutions that were implemented aimed to meet urgent needs, they were seldom the best foundation on which to build a sustainable digital future or realize efficiencies and meet the expectations of the judiciary and Canadians.

In the summer of 2022, CAS closed the current iteration of the CRMS Project Definition phase to absorb lessons learned and determine a more viable way forward; one that would be more user-centric, iterative, and aligned with the Government of Canada’s Digital Ambition and requirements of the Policy on Service and Digital. The experience also drove home the importance of aligning the Courts’ expectations for digital projects, and of our internal capacity to manage and realize increasingly strategic and indispensable digital projects.

Along with CAS’s regular maintenance of legacy systems, we began implementing a foundational reset to expand our internal digital capacity, work with the Courts to better align expectations, and incrementally deliver better digital tools and practices to improve court operations, including:

CAS is investing in, as well as levering, new technologies and emerging trends, not only to improve our services, but also to improve access to justice and meet the expectations of Canadians. Failure to do so would undermine the relevance of the Courts, and ultimately erode trust in the Courts and judicial system. In the coming year, CAS will further investigate emerging technologies, deploy automation to improve court and registry processes, and pilot the potential for artificial intelligence to add to our translation processes and capabilities.

National courthouses and court facilitiesDeliver modern, equipped, accessible and secure federal court facilities across Canada.

In 2022–23, CAS secured significant investments and set out a multi-year plan, referred to as the National Courts Facilities Modernization Program (NCFMP), to address medium to long-term requirements for modern, equipped, accessible and secure courtrooms and court facilities across Canada. These investments will help ensure that our facilities continue to meet users’ needs and expectations and improve access to justice. Notably, the National Judicial Complex in Montréal will be the first court facility dedicated exclusively to the Courts.

The scope of the NCFMP work is considerable and will be staged over 5 years. In 2022–23, we completed the following:

Throughout the year, many smaller-scale, though necessary, facilities improvements were completed, including:

Over the course of the year, the preventative measures put in place in CAS facilities (public, staff working areas and courtrooms) in response to the pandemic were adjusted and ultimately removed to reflect the evolution of public health guidelines.

In 2022–23, CAS continued to equip more courtrooms with modern technology to improve the service experience of hearings through improved access to digital documents in courtrooms and an improved ability to conduct hearings virtually or in a hybrid format. As stated above, 6 courtrooms were upgraded to e-courtrooms: 3 in Toronto, 1 in Ottawa, 1 in Vancouver and 1 in Calgary. CAS also increased the use of service-design practices to ensure that technology investments truly improved the courtroom experience, for both members of the Courts and litigants.

Workforce of the futureAttract, retain and develop a highly- skilled, diverse and engaged workforce. Optimize our work environment and strengthen management excellence.

CAS’s ability to provide services to the Courts and Canadians is an expression of the strength of its workforce. Much of the work undertaken at CAS requires specialized skills and knowledge, and success necessitates high-achieving employees who are both agile and innovative, as well as diversity across our ranks. Consequently, both employee training and retention have emerged as key challenges to maintaining our high standard of service post-pandemic.

In this context, in 2022–23, CAS undertook initiatives to ensure it had the right people in place with the right skills to meet the Courts’ needs. By prioritizing progress in the areas of accessibility, diversity, equity, inclusion, recruitment, wellbeing and mental health, CAS is building a workforce that represents the public we serve, and that has the skills, expertise, experience, and support to meet the evolving needs of the Courts, Canadians and the public service. Highlights for the fiscal year 2022–23 included:

Message from CAS’s Innovation Champion

Innovation is the lifeblood of CAS. In a context of stringent resourcing, aging information technology infrastructure and, not so long ago, pandemic limitations, our staff finds ways to deliver services that support the administration of justice. As we pursue modernization, we continue to rely on the ingenuity of our employees to realize positive change while maintaining operations at the Courts.

One challenge we face as an organization, however, is that we toil in silos. By default, our innovations are not common knowledge across the organization and the Courts because of our unique structure.

As Innovation Champion, I want the rising tide to float all boats. I want the can-do attitude and triumphs of our employees to blossom into a common culture of innovation.

The first step is to share. We are bringing simple stories of how employees made their work better from one corner of CAS and broadcasting them to the whole organization.

Once collected, these stories will help us ask some deeper questions. What made these successes possible? What got in the way? What can we do to keep it happening?

Making space to conceive, implement and champion innovation is a key to efficient and effective services, staff engagement and retention, and value for money. I look forward to sharing CAS’s success stories and fertilizing others.

Service excellenceProvide consistent, quality and timely client-centric services. Modernize our practices, processes and tools and integrate new business and technological solutions.

CAS’s guiding principle remains service excellence. By adopting a service-oriented mindset, applying service design principles, and placing justice system users at the center of what we do, CAS is improving how we deliver high-quality, modern, secure, accessible and reliable services to improve Canadians’ access to and experience with the justice system.

In 2022–23, CAS continued to focus on driving a cultural shift towards service excellence. Initiatives for the past fiscal year included:

Providing our court decisions in both official languages continues to be a challenge that will increase in the coming years. Amendments to the Official Languages Act will come into force in June 2024, requiring CAS to release decisions in both official languages simultaneously when they are of precedential value. The impact on CAS’s operations will be very significant and resource intensive.

In 2022–23, in preparation for the implementation of the new requirements, CAS reviewed internal translation processes, negotiated augmented capacity from the Translation Bureau, secured new contracts with private-sector translation services, established agreements with graduate programs in legal translation, improved capacity, refined a costing model for the anticipated increase in volume, and worked with Government of Canada colleagues to identify approaches to funding. Nonetheless, expanded obligations without commensurate funding creates a very real possibility that we will be unable to comply. Recognizing the importance of our official language obligations, CAS will prioritize securing appropriate funding to ensure Canadians are able to access court decisions in the official language of their choice, as part of our commitment to access to justice.

Protocol Services

Some of the most momentous occasions in the course of a year are the swearing-in ceremonies for new judges, individuals who have reached the pinnacle of their profession. These are both solemn and celebratory occasions, and CAS is proud to lead their coordination.

In 2022–23, CAS coordinated 5 such ceremonies: 1 for the FCA, 1 for the FC and 3 for the TCC. In consultation with the chief justices, CAS plans the ceremonies according to the Order of Precedence for Canada, and in keeping with protocol for special sittings of the Court.

Looking ahead, 2023–24 will be a busy year as CAS coordinates 9 ceremonies for judges appointed during the pandemic, as well any additional ceremonies for those newly appointed. CAS also leads other protocol events such as swearing-out ceremonies of chief justices, portrait unveiling ceremonies, and opening ceremonies of new court facilities.

Part II: Who we are

For almost 20 years, CAS has been integral to the shield that safeguards the judicial independence that is the foundation of Canada’s judicial system. Our services support the Courts and facilitate access to justice for all Canadians by enabling litigants and legal counsel to submit disputes and other matters to be heard before the Courts. CAS safeguards and enhances the independence of the Courts, particularly through the provision of quality and efficient judicial, registry and administrative services.

Mandate

CAS was established on July 2, 2003, with the coming into force of the Courts Administration Service Act, S.C. 2002, c. 8 (CAS Act). As described in section 2 of the CAS Act, our mandate is to:

Access to justice

In its philosophy and operations, CAS subscribes to a broad definition of access to justice shared by the Department of Justice:

Enabling Canadians to obtain information and assistance they need to help prevent legal issues from arising and help them to resolve such issues efficiently, affordably, and fairly, either through informal resolution mechanisms, where possible, or the formal justice system, when necessary.

CAS’s mandate is thus firmly anchored in access to justice, given the prerogative to both safeguard judicial independence and realize the effective and efficient provision of administrative services. In addition, each of our strategic priorities—digital courts, workforce of the future, national courthouses and court facilities, and service excellence—are designed to prioritize access to justice for all those who turn to the Canadian justice system.

Our mission

Providing innovative, timely and efficient judicial, registry, e-court, security and corporate services to the Courts.

Our goal

We are a national and international model of excellence in judicial administration.

Our values

Transparency
We aim to provide timely and unfettered access to clear and accurate information.

Respect
We recognize that our employees are entitled to work in a harassment-free environment where everyone can freely express their opinions without fear of recrimination or reprisal.

Innovation
We encourage a work environment that fosters creativity and new ideas to improve our business practices and the quality of our services.

Wellness
We advocate attitudes and activities in the workplace that generate a sense of spirit and belonging, that have a potential to improve overall physical and mental health, and that facilitate, encourage and promote fun and a balanced work and personal life.

Excellence
We strive to be exemplary in everything we do.

Service delivery across Canada

The Courts that CAS serves are national and itinerant, holding hearings across Canada to reach Canadians wherever they are. The Chief Justices are responsible for the judicial functions of their Courts, including the direction and supervision of court sittings and the assignment of judicial duties.

As of March 31, 2023, CAS had 792 full-time employees providing services to 91 members of the Courts, including Chief Justices, Associate Chief Justices, Justices, Associate Judges and Supernumeraries.

Judicial and registry services are offered in every province and territory through a network of 13 permanent offices and agreements with seven provincial and territorial courts. CAS supports members of the Courts in preparing files, conducting hearings and writing decisions “anywhere, anytime,” and maintains 57 courtrooms across Canada. The headquarters of the Courts are located in Ottawa, with primary regional offices in Vancouver, Toronto and Montréal, and local offices in Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Hamilton, Québec, Halifax, Fredericton and St. John’s.

Services offered

Judicial services

CAS provides legal services and administrative support services to assist members of the Courts in the discharge of their judicial functions. Our judicial services are delivered by legal counsel, judicial administrators, law clerks, jurilinguists, judicial assistants, library personnel and court attendants, under the direction of the four Chief Justices and members of the Courts.

Registry services

Registry services are delivered under the direction of each the Courts through the respective registries, which process legal documents, provide information to litigants on court procedures, maintain court records, participate in court hearings, and support and assist in enforcing court orders. Our registry staff also work closely with the offices of the four Chief Justices to ensure that matters are heard and decisions are rendered promptly.

E-courts

The e-court program modernizes the administration of justice by providing a range of modern, scalable and fully integrated electronic court and registry management solutions. The e-court program includes electronic filing of documents, transmittal of judicial orders and reasons and electronic hearings.

Security

The Court Security Program contributes to the safety of the Courts by developing, implementing and ensuring compliance with policies and procedures designed to ensure the safety and security of members of the judiciary, litigants and employees. The program also cultivates and enhances the organization’s capacity to respond to threats through ongoing collaboration with law enforcement departments and agencies and the optimum use of security intelligence. Furthermore, the program identifies capability gaps and develops solutions to address deficiencies and enhance the organization’s capabilities against potential threats.

Corporate services

CAS furnishes a full range of corporate services to support the Courts and their respective registries. These services include acquisitions; communications services; financial management; human resources management; information management; information technology; legal services; management and oversight services; material; real property; travel and other administrative services.

Governance and accountability

CAS is an independent organization within the portfolio of the Minister of Justice, with an arm’s length relationship with the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada. As the chief executive officer of the organization and its deputy head, the Chief Administrator supervises and directs the work of CAS, with all the powers necessary to ensure the overall effective and efficient management and administration of court services. Our accountabilities are maintained through annual reports to Parliament. In addition, CAS’s governance structure ensures meaningful consultation with the Courts and the participation of their members in key governance committees to discuss Court priorities. The Chief Justices Steering Committee (CJSC) advises the Chief Administrator on CAS’s priorities, risks, budget allocations and other significant matters affecting the Courts. The CJSC is supported by three national judges committees (Security, Information Management/Information Technology and Accommodations), whose membership includes representatives of each of the Courts and CAS.

Powers, duties and functions of the Chief Administrator and chief justices

The Chief Administrator is the deputy head and Chief Executive Officer of CAS and is accountable to Parliament through the Minister of Justice.

Subsections 7(2) and 7(3) of the CAS Act specify that the Chief Administrator has all the powers necessary for providing effective and efficient management and administration of court services, including court facilities, libraries, corporate services and staffing; and structuring registry operations and preparing budgets, in consultation with the chief justices of the Courts, for the requirements of those Courts and the related needs of CAS.

Section 8 of the CAS Act confirms that the chief justices are responsible for the judicial functions of their Courts. This includes the power to determine the sittings of the Court, assign judges to sittings, determine the sitting schedules and places of sittings for judges and determine the total annual, monthly and weekly workload of judges. Moreover, officers, clerks and employees of CAS discharge their duties at the direction of the respective Chief Justice in matters that are assigned by law to the judiciary.

Subsection 9(1) of the CAS Act provides that “[a] chief justice may issue binding directions in writing to the Chief Administrator with respect to any matter within the Chief Administrator’s authority.”

In 2022–23, the Chief Administrator received 3 subsection 9(1) directions from the Chief Justice of the TCC relating to the approach to communicating with staff on hybrid work, and the desire to create new corporate positions within the TCC support organization.

These directions were considered within the legislative framework of the CAS Act and other related legislation. It was concluded that a direction issued by a chief justice cannot extend beyond the power the Chief Administrator enjoys; cannot be a vehicle by which one Court binds another; and cannot be inconsistent with the purposes identified in section 2 of the CAS Act. Within this framework, the directions were not found to be fully binding; nonetheless, the issues they raised were taken into consideration and steps were taken to address some of the underlying issues raised.

Given their contents and implications, the TCC subsection 9(1) directions and the Chief Administrator’s response thereto were shared with all the chief justices. This led to 2 directions from the Chief Justice of the FCA reinforcing the position of the Chief Administrator.

In addition, issues continued relating to a previous, 2020 TCC subsection 9(1) direction regarding the cleaning services. CAS continues to actively monitor and take action when necessary to ensure the direction is addressed appropriately.

Part III: The Courts we serve

The Courts we serve were established by the Parliament of Canada pursuant to its authority under section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867 “for the better administration of the Laws of Canada”. In the exercise of their respective roles, the Courts make decisions, interpret and establish precedents, set standards and decide questions of law.

See Appendix II for a glossary of terms used in this section.

2022–23 statistics at a glance

Federal Court of Appeal

The FCA is a national, bilingual, bijural, superior court of record that has jurisdiction to hear appeals of judgments and orders, whether final or interlocutory, of the FC and the TCC. It may also review decisions of certain federal tribunals pursuant to section 28 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7 and hear appeals under other federal legislation. Further information on the FCA is available of the FCA website.

Table 1 below provides an overview of the workload of judicial and registry services in support of the FCA by fiscal year.

Table 1: FCA workload
  2022–23 2021–22 2020–21 2019–20 2018–19
Proceedings instituted or filed 309 357 342 490 463
Court judgments, orders and directions processed by the registry 1,547 1,562 1,350 1,965 1,444
Files prepared for hearing and heard in court 224 216 163 239 200
Days in court 194 181 147 191 156
Recorded entries 16,358 17,947 16,208 22,632 20,294
Total dispositions 386 356 357 532 357
Active proceedings as of March 31
Appeals from the FC (final judgments) 151 199 188 170 168
Appeals from the FC (interlocutory judgments) 63 80 63 76 76
Appeals from the TCC 88 92 103 136 182
Applications for judicial review 78 90 100 80 91
Others 24 18 23 35 23
Total 404 479 477 497 540
Status of active proceedings as of March 31
Not perfected 214 259 255 276 290
Perfected 77 127 134 89 71
Consolidated 10 6 18 31 43
Reserved 60 44 22 34 49
Scheduled for hearing 26 28 31 32 40
Stayed 17 15 17 35 47
Total 404 479 477 497 540

Source: Proceedings Management System

Federal Court

The FC is a national, bilingual, bijural, superior court of record that hears and decides legal disputes arising in the federal domain. Its jurisdiction derives primarily from the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7, although over 100 other federal statutes also confer jurisdiction on the Court. It has original, but not exclusive jurisdiction, over proceedings by and against the Crown (including Aboriginal law claims), and proceedings involving admiralty and intellectual property law. It has exclusive jurisdiction to hear certain national security proceedings and applications for judicial review of the decisions of federal commissions, tribunals and boards. Further information on the FC is available on the FC website.

Table 2 below provides an overview of the workload of judicial and registry services in support of the FC by fiscal year.

Table 2: FC workload
  2022–23 2021–22 2020–21 2019–20 2018–19
Proceedings instituted or filed 27,438 15,809 8,100 33,727 33,088
General proceedings and immigration 17,250 12,272 7,732 9,511 8,866
Income Tax Act certificates 6,315 1,660 18 14,966 15,394
    Excise Tax Act certificates 3,615 1,542 98 8,981 8,513
Other instruments and certificates 258 335 252 269 315
Court judgments, orders and directions processed by the Registry 25,753 24,302 16,140 22,851 19,599
Files prepared for hearing and heard in court 3,798 3,831 2,981 4,010 3,602
Days in court 2,888 3,137 2,347 2,905 2,741
Recorded entries 308,763 248,782 170,612 263,652 245,497
Total dispositions – General proceedings and immigration 14,873 10,653 5,981 8,417 7,370
Active proceedings as of March 31
Aboriginal 248 238 252 238 244
Other appeals provided for by law 59 70 71 68 57
Citizenship 83 74 45 33 27
Admiralty 269 243 181 178 181
Intellectual property 450 453 472 516 552
Immigration and refugee 7,792 6,590 5,821 4,140 3,264
Crown 634 630 624 781 689
Judicial review 1,186 870 777 893 858
Patented Medicines Regulations 66 41 68 63 32
Total 10,787 9,209 8,311 6,910 5,904
Status of active proceedings as of March 31
Not perfected 7,038 5,463 4,327 4,310 3,799
Perfected 2,098 1,652 2,694 653 577
Consolidated 268 152 125 145 118
Reserved 283 375 151 222 214
Scheduled for hearing 604 598 501 501 354
Stayed 496 969 513 1079 842
Total 10,787 9,209 8,311 6,910 5,904

Source: Proceedings Management System

Court Martial Appeal Court

The CMAC is a national, bilingual, superior court of record that hears appeals of court martial decisions. Courts martial are military courts established under the National Defence Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. N-5 that hear cases under the Code of Service Discipline. The judges of the CMAC are appointed by the Governor in Council from the FCA, the FC and the trial and appellate justices of provincial superior courts. Further information on the CMAC is available on the CMAC website.

Table 3 below provides an overview of the workload of judicial and registry services in support of the CMAC by fiscal year.

Table 3: CMAC workload
  2022–23 2021–22 2020–21 2019–20 2018–19
Proceedings instituted or filed 9 8 12 7 5
Court judgments, orders and directions processed by the registry 21 41 51 12 7
Files prepared for hearing and heard in court 9 7 20 3 3
Days in court 9 8 12 3 3
Recorded entries 444 407 361 227 135
Total dispositions 10 11 3 8 4
Active proceedings as of March 31
Application for review of a decision 0 0 0 0 0
Notice of appeal 8 9 11 3 5
Application for review of an undertaking 0 0 1 0 0
Notice of motion commencing an appeal 0 0 0 0 0
Total 8 9 12 3 5
Status of active proceedings as of March 31
Not perfected 5 5 2 2 2
Perfected 0 0 1 0 2
Consolidated 0 0 0 0 0
Reserved 3 3 6 0 1
Scheduled for hearing 0 1 2 1 0
Stayed 0 0 1 0 0
Total 8 9 12 3 5
Status as of March 31
Complaint against a military judge* 0 0 0 0 0

Source: Proceedings Management System

* Pursuant to subsection 165.31(1) of the National Defence Act, the Chief Justice of the CMAC has the power to appoint 3 judges of his Court to serve as members of the Military Judges Inquiry Committee. This committee has jurisdiction to commence an inquiry in relation to a complaint filed against a military judge of a court martial.

Tax Court of Canada

The TCC is a national, bilingual, superior court of record that has exclusive original jurisdiction to hear appeals and references pursuant to 14 federal statutes. Most of the appeals filed with the Court are on matters arising under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 1, Part IX of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-1 (GST/HST), Part IV of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23, and Part I of the Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-8. The constitution of the TCC is established by section 4 of the Tax Court of Canada Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. T-2. Further information on the TCC is available on the TCC website.

Table 4 below provides an overview of the workload of the TCC by fiscal year.

Table 4: TCC workload
  2022–23 2021–22 2020–21 2019–20 2018–19
Proceedings instituted or filed 3,230 3,426 2,235 4,684 5,211
Court judgments, orders and directions processed by the registry 12,391 10,278 7,043 13,603 13,759
Files prepared for hearing and heard in court 713 166 273 883 888
Days in court* - - - - -
Recorded entries 152,927 122,263 91,329 177,820 181,006
Total dispositions 3,876 2,427 2,626 4,935 4,968
Active proceedings as of March 31
Goods and Services Tax / Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) 1,584 1,622 1,539 1,453 1,390
Income tax 8,328 9,470 8,576 8,727 8,680
Employment Insurance and Canada Pension Plan 316 344 301 298 347
Others 45 68 40 31 54
Total 10,273 11,504 10,456 10,509 10,471
Status of active proceedings as of March 31
Not perfected 902 962 820 918 1,086
Perfected 3,216 4,452 4,719 3,513 2,719
Reserved 206 60 47 669 143
Awaiting timetable 224 152 107 151 188
Scheduled for hearing 1,358 1,120 740 963 1,536
Specially managed cases 2,987 2,815 1,964 2,014 2,571
Awaiting another decision 1,380 1,943 2,059 2,281 2,228
Total 10,273 11,504 10,456 10,509 10,471

* Data limitations prevent reporting on TCC’s Days in Court

Source: Appeal System Plus

Part IV: Management discussion and analysis

Operating environment

In 2022–23, the following factors affected the environment within which CAS operates:

Future plans

Digital courtsDeliver information technology solutions that provide for the effective management of court business, offer self-service to litigants and improve access to justice.

In 2023–24, CAS will accelerate the strategic development and incorporation of digital tools to improve the delivery of and access to justice in the Courts. Planned highlights for 2023–24 include:

Court facilitiesDeliver modern, equipped, accessible and secure federal court facilities across Canada.

In 2023–24, CAS will continue to advance the NCFMP. Planned highlights for 2023–24 include:

Workforce of the futureAttract, retain and develop a highly skilled, diverse and engaged workforce. Optimize our work environment and strengthen management excellence.

Planned highlights for 2023–24 include:

Service excellenceProvide consistent, quality and timely client-centric services. Modernize our practices, processes and tools and integrate new business and technological solutions.

CAS aims to enhance services and provide positive experiences for the Courts and those who appear before them. Planned highlights for 2023–24 include:

Key corporate risks

CAS operates in a complex, changing environment, characterized by a wide array of dependencies and interdependencies. In this context, CAS is exposed to a range of potential risks that, should they materialize, would make it more difficult to realize its planned results and outcomes.

In 2022–23, CAS launched a comprehensive process to identify most significant exposures, as well as their causes, potential impacts and current and future mitigation measures.

The key corporate risks are:

In 2023–24, CAS will launch a corporate-wide program of active risk management. Not only will this ensure that key exposures are well-managed and results achieved, but it will also allow CAS to better understand which calculated risks should be accepted and still promote advancements, innovation and transformation. Risk management and strategic planning go hand in hand, and establishing a risk profile supports decision making and allocation of limited resources to the appropriate risks.

Part V: Financial statement highlights

The highlights presented in this section are drawn from CAS’s financial statements (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2022. These financial statements are prepared on an accrual basis and have been prepared using Government of Canada accounting policies, which are based on Canadian public-sector accounting standards.

Condensed statement of operations (unaudited) for the year ended March 31, 2022 (dollars)
Financial Information 2022–23
Planned
Results
2022–23
Actual
Results
2021–22
Actual
Results
Difference
(2022–23 Actual Results minus
2022–23 Planned Results)
Difference
(2022–23 Actual Results minus
2021–22 Actual Results)
Total expenses 131,122,575 145,940,614 130,920,683 14,818,039 15,019,931
Total revenues 0 159 307 159 (148)
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers 131,122,575 145,940,773 130,920,990 14,818,198 15,019,783

Note:
The 2022–23 planned results are those reported in the future-Oriented Statement of Operations included in the 2022–23 Departmental Plan.

Expenses: CAS’s total expenses were $145,940,614 in 2022–23 ($130,920,683 in 2021–22). The increase of $15,019,931 (11.47%) is mainly due to the increase of $8,410,595 in salaries and wages, and an increase of $6,609,336 in operating expenses.

Revenues: The majority of CAS’s revenues are earned on behalf of Government. Such revenues are non-respendable, meaning that they cannot be used by CAS, and are deposited directly into the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF). CAS earns a small amount of respendable revenue from the sale of Crown assets. CAS’s gross revenues were $3,431,161 in 2022–23 ($2,397,611 in 2021–22) and its net revenues were $159 in 2022–23 ($307 in 2021–22).

Condensed statement of financial position (unaudited) as of March 31, 2023 (dollars)
Financial Information 2022–23 2021–22 Difference
(2022–23 minus
2021–22)
Total net liabilities 26,492,419 24,370,814 2,121,605
Total net financial assets 16,580,852 19,847,492 (3,266,640)
Departmental net debt 9,911,567 4,523,322 5,388,245
Total non-financial assets 28,423,627 29,164,849 (741,222)
Departmental net financial position 18,512,060 24,641,527 (6,129,467)

Note:

Total liabilities: CAS’s net liabilities as at March 31, 2023 were $26,492,419 ($24,370,814 as at March 31, 2022). The increase of $2,121,605 (8.71%) is the result of the following:

Assets: The composition of CAS’s financial and non-financial assets is as follows:

Financial assets:

Non-financial assets:

Total net financial assets: This is comprised of financial assets net of accounts receivable held on behalf of Government. Accounts receivable held on behalf of the Government of Canada consist primarily of accounts receivable from other governmental organizations. The decrease of $3,266,640 is due to a decrease in the accounts receivable and advances and amount due from the CRF as well as an increase in accounts receivable and advances held on behalf of the Government.

Total non-financial assets: The decrease of $741,222 is mainly due to a decrease of $1,730,060 in tangible capital assets related to facilities renovation projects, and installation of informatics equipment. This decrease is partly offset by an increase of $959,669 in prepaid expenses and $29,169 in inventory.

Departmental net debt: This provides a measure of the future authorities required to pay for past transactions and events.

Departmental net financial position: This represents the net resources (financial and non-financial) that will be used to provide future services to the Courts and thereby to benefit Canadians.

Further financial information

The Financial Statements and Financial Statement Discussion and Analysis are available online at: http://www.cas-satj.gc.ca/en/publications/dpr.shtml.

Appendix I - Acronyms

Acronyms
Term Definition
CASCourts Administration Service
CJSCChief Justices Steering Committee
CMAC Court Martial Appeal Court
CRMS Courts and Registry Management System
FC Federal Court
FCA Federal Court of Appeal
GST/HST Goods and Services Tax / Harmonized Sales Tax
NCFMP National Courts Facilities Modernization Program
R.S.C. Revised Statues of Canada
S.C. Statues of Canada
TCC Tax Court of Canada

Appendix II - Glossary

Glossary
Term Definition
Appeal from Federal Court (final judgment) A proceeding instituted in the Federal Court of Appeal challenging a final judgment of the Federal Court.
Appeal from Federal Court (interlocutory judgment) A proceeding instituted in the Federal Court of Appeal challenging an interlocutory judgment of the Federal Court.
Application for judicial review A document that commences a proceeding in the Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court challenging the decision of a federal board, commission or tribunal.
Application for review of a direction A document that commences a proceeding in the Court Martial Appeal Court to review a direction of a military judge (paragraph 5(1)(a) of the Court Martial Appeal Court Rules and section 159.9 of the National Defence Act).
Application for review of conditions of an undertaking A document that commences a proceeding in the Court Martial Appeal Court to review the conditions of an undertaking (paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Court Martial Appeal Court Rules and section 248.8 of the National Defence Act).
Associate judges Judicial officers appointed under section 12 of the Federal Courts Act and section 11.1 of the Tax Court of Canada Act. (Associate judges were formerly known as prothonotaries or a prothonotary).
Bijural Refers to Canada’s 2 systems of law: the common law and the civil law.
Consolidated When different cases that have the same parties or have certain elements in common are heard together.
Days in court Sitting days where a registrar attends in person, by videoconference or by teleconference.
Directions Instructions given by a judge or associate judge, in writing or oral.
Dispositions Proceedings concluded by way of judgment, discontinuance or other documents.
Files prepared for hearing and heard in court Number of appeals, hearings, judicial reviews, motions and meetings heard by the court.
Judgments A final decision of a judge or associate judge of all of the issues raised in a case.
Not perfected When the parties have not yet done everything required of them, according to the rules or orders of the court, in order for the case to be ready to be scheduled for a hearing.
Notice of appeal A proceeding instituted in the Court Martial Appeal Court to appeal a decision from a court martial.
Notice of motion commencing an appeal A proceeding instituted in the Court Martial Appeal Court to appeal a decision or an order refusing an application to be released from detention or imprisonment or an order rendered under section 248.81 of the National Defence Act.
Orders A type of decision of a judge or associate judge.
Perfected When the parties have complied with the rules or orders or direction of the Court, in order for the proceeding to be ready to be scheduled for a hearing.
Proceedings instituted or filed A matter before the Court which includes appeals, actions, applications, applications for leave and for judicial review and where provided for by federal statutes, administrative proceedings such as the ones instituted by the filing of certificates, decisions or orders of federal boards, commissions or other tribunals in the registry of the Courts for the purpose of enforcement.
Recorded entries Entry and identification of documents and events in the Proceedings Management System (in the Federal Court of Appeal, Federal Court and Court Martial Appeal Court; and the Appeals System Plus in the Tax Court of Canada).
Reserved When a judge or associate judge does not render a decision immediately after a case has been heard or argued.
Scheduled for hearing Proceedings in which a hearing, on the facts and evidence in a case, has been scheduled.
Specially managed cases A proceeding that has been assigned to a specific judge or associate judge.
Stayed When a proceeding, decision or action by a person or entity is stopped or put a hold.

Contact us

Courtrooms and registry operations of the FCA, FC and CMAC

Thomas D’Arcy McGee Building
90 Sparks Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H9

Courtrooms and registry operations of the TCC

Centennial Towers
200 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0M1

Telephone

FCA and CMAC: 613-996-6795
FC: 613-992-4238
TCC: 613-992-0901

Fax

FCA and CMAC: 613-952-7226
FC (non-immigration): 613-952-3653
FC (immigration): 613-947-2141
TCC: 613-957-9034

Teletypewriter (TTY)

FCA and FC: 613-995-4640
CMAC: 613-947-0407
TCC: 613-943-0946

Toll-free numbers

FCA: 1-800-565-0541
FC: 1-800-663-2096
CMAC: 1-800-665-3329
TCC: 1-800-927-5499

Information on regional and local Registry offices can be found on CAS’s website.

Date modified: