Quarterly Financial Report - For the quarter ended June 30, 2014

Introduction

This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the Main Estimates, as well as Canada’s Economic Action Plan 2012 (Budget 2012). It has been prepared by management as required by section 65.1 of the Financial Administration Act and in the form and manner prescribed by Treasury Board. This quarterly report has not been subject to an external audit or review.

The role of the Courts Administration Service (CAS) is to provide effective and efficient registry, judicial and corporate services to the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada and the Tax Court of Canada. Further details on CAS’ programs can be found in the 2014-15 Main Estimates .

Basis of Presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes CAS’ spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the organization consistent with the 2014-15 Main Estimates. This quarterly report has been prepared using a prescribed financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts, or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

CAS uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental performance reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

Highlights of fiscal quarter and fiscal year to date (YTD) results

Significant Changes to Authorities available for use for the year
As at June 30, 2014, authorities available for use for the year decreased by $440 thousand (-1%) compared to the same quarter in 2013-14, from $68,498 thousand to $68,058 thousand. As a result of the Government expenditure management cycle and certain conditions imposed by Central Agencies, there are often significant fluctuations by quarter between authorities received and the timing of expenditures realized.

This decrease in authorities is partly due to a $508 thousand reduction in funding related to the implementation of savings measures announced in Budget 2012. The details of these savings measures are explained in the Budget 2012 Implementation section below. In addition, a $374 thousand decrease in authorities is attributable to adjustments to CAS’ contributions to employee benefit plans as per central agency direction.

These decreases in authorities were partly offset by an increase in funding of $366 thousand received for negotiated salary increases in newly signed collective agreements. There were also various other minor changes resulting in a net $76 thousand increase in authorities.

Significant Changes Expenditures
First-quarter expenditures
First-quarter expenditures increased by $768 thousand (5%) compared to the same quarter in 2013-14, from $15,840 thousand to $16,608 thousand. As illustrated in Figure 1, 24% of the authorities available for use for the year were expended during the first quarter of 2014-15, compared to 23% in the same quarter of 2013-14.

Figure 1 –First-quarter Expenditures Compared to Annual Authorities

The increase in first-quarter expenditures is primarily due to a one-time transition payment of $1,484 thousand for implementing salary payment in arrears by the Government of Canada. This one-time payment has been classified under “Other subsidies and payments” expenditure as per central agency direction. As compensation, CAS will receive additional appropriations from central sources later this fiscal year or will be credited this amount through the normal carry-forward process at year end.

The above increase was offset by a decrease in first-quarter personnel expenditures by $866 thousand (-7%) compared to the same quarter in 2013-14, from $12,782 thousand to $11,916 thousand. This decrease is primarily related to the timing of the ongoing settlement of previously earned and accrued severance pay as a result of changes to the severance pay program.

Minor variations in the timing of the delivery of goods and services account for the remaining
$150 thousand increase in first-quarter expenditures in the current year compared to the same quarter in the prior year.

Risks and Uncertainties

Funding
The financial situation of CAS remains precarious and it will continue to pose both risks and challenges in the years to come. For some years, CAS has been lacking the permanent funding necessary to enable the organization to fully meet its commitments and address major program integrity issues. Budget 2011 partially addressed this need, providing CAS with approximately $3 million per year for some program integrity measures. However, Budget 2014 announced that the operating budget of departments would be frozen at their 2013-14 level for the years 2014-15 and 2015-16. This represents a significant risk and uncertainty for CAS because additional funding will not be received for future salary increases resulting from newly signed collective bargaining agreements. Management is reviewing various options to adjust to this constraint in funding.

Judicial functions of the courts are a responsibility of the judiciary and impose requirements that are beyond CAS control. A majority of the non-personnel expenses incurred by CAS are contracted costs for services supporting the judicial process and court hearings. They include translation, court reporters, transcripts, and security services, and they are mostly driven by the number, type and duration of hearings conducted in any given year. These are essentially non-discretionary and limit the organization's financial flexibility.

The aforementioned pressures and uncertainties continue to impact the ability of CAS to deliver on its programs and to support the judiciary. The lack of funding impacts the upgrade of aging information technology systems, necessary enhancement of security measures, maintenance and upgrade of court facilities to address health and safety concerns and other capital projects.

Risk Management
To address these risks, CAS will continue to monitor closely its budget spending through frequent reviews of expenditures to rapidly identify and address financial pressures. CAS will also continue to work collaboratively with central agencies to identify a sustainable funding model.

Significant changes in relation to operations, personnel and programs

There were no significant changes in relation to CAS operations, personnel and programs.

Budget 2012 Implementation

This section provides an overview of the savings measures announced in Budget 2012 that are being implemented in order to refocus government and programs, make it easier for Canadians and business to deal with their government and, modernize and reduce the back office.

To contribute to the Government’s effort to reduce the deficit, CAS has committed to use its resources more efficiently, by streamlining its services and redistributing work. In 2012-13 and 2013-14, CAS achieved savings of approximately $0.5 million. Savings increased to an ongoing amount of $1.0 million in 2014-15.

Significant Changes to Planned and Actual Expenditures
There was a $508 thousand decrease in authorities in the first quarter of 2014-15 compared to the same quarter in 2013-14 related to the implementation of savings measures announced in Budget 2012. By the end of fiscal year 2014-15, corresponding savings in actual expenditures will be realized. There was no significant variance in workforce adjustment costs in the first quarter of 2014-15 compared to the same quarter of 2013-14.

Risks and Uncertainties
There are no financial risks or uncertainties related to Budget 2012 savings.

Significant changes in relation to operations, personnel and programs
There were no significant changes in CAS operations, personnel and programs as a result of the implementation of the measures announced in Budget 2012.

Approval by Senior Officials

Approved by:

(Ottawa, Canada)
(August 29, 2014)

1 - Includes only Authorities available for use and granted by Parliament at quarter-end.